Doubt generally conjures up negative connotations. We link
it with mistrust and feel offended if the doubt is directed at us. In the arena
of faith, doubt is often seen as its direct opposite, yet many who express deep
faith profess to have doubts and find comfort and even impetus through them.
‘Doubt isn’t the opposite
of faith; it is an element of faith.’ (Paul Tillich)
‘If you would be a real
seeker after truth, it is necessary that at least once in your life you doubt,
as far as possible, all things.’ (Rene Descartes)
Descartes, who is probably more famous for his ‘I think,
therefore I am’ quotation than the one cited above was the Father of Cartesian
philosophy – the idea that all existence should be questioned in order to be understood.
Whilst we could get caught up in a mind bending exercise to argue that this is
not some dream existence (although perhaps after Trump’s inauguration
yesterday, some people wish it was), I am happy for now (especially as I write)
to assume both your existence and my own.
Asserting doubts is the beginning of self-autonomy. As
toddlers our common refrain would have been ‘why?’ I remember the common
response being ‘because I said so!’ This response is the reassertion of
dominance. For some level the toddler is questioning the knowledge and
authority of the parent. Whilst dealing with this can be frustrating it is a
necessary path to curiosity and independent thought.
In a world of post-truth perhaps doubt and questioning are
our greatest allies. The educational system in this country is being blamed for
not nurturing critical thinkers and independent learners but surely this is
something we could all do with developing further. Tweets and posts have become
‘gospel truth’ that we either choose to believe or ignore. Perhaps we need to
give less credit and time to gossip columnists and social commentators and
instead give more attention to those who are prepared to question the status
quo.
During this last week I went to see Martin Scorsese’s
‘Silence’. I was really impressed by Andrew Garfield’s portrayal of a Jesuit
priest. I then discovered that in preparation for the film he completed the
Ignatian Spiritual Exercises. In a recent interview he was asked about faith
and whether he had doubts about God and the after-life.
‘…And I think a life of
faith is not a life of certainty. A life of faith is a life of –
of doubt. And I think it is so healthy to doubt. It’s so
health to doubt oneself, it’s so healthy to doubt any assumption we make about
how to live. And I think – what I say when – what I mean when I say
certainty scares me, certainty starts war. Certainty starts war on
behalf of ideology. Certainty of the ‘I – I know and
you don't.’ That's the scariest thing to me and what – what a human
being is capable of doing.’
This is the kind of doubt I think we could all do with
considering. Doubt that questions my assumptions. Doubt that allows for your
view as much as mine.
What do you think?
What are the benefits of doubts?
Would critical thinking benefit teenagers, our society?
Suzi, I really worry about the world being in "post-truth".
ReplyDeleteAt the centre of this world is not the false battle between Religion and Atheism, but the false friendship between the media and politics. We need to be very careful about how "well informed" we are, and we need to work harder, despite the proliferation of sources.
This situation has developed over a period of 25-30 years, and the trend is probably accelerating along with tech advances. I'd put Saturday, 11 April 1992 as the watershed in the UK, with the headline: "It's The Sun Wot Won It".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It's_The_Sun_Wot_Won_It
The dubious WikiLeaks episodes become necessary in the interests of proper reporting. It has become a very difficult problem which damages not only trust and the possibility of truth, but our political values and democracy itself:
On 26 August 2016, Julian Assange spoke to Fox News and said that Clinton was causing "hysteria about Russia" after the Democratic Party, along with a number of cybersecurity experts and cybersecurity firms, claimed that Russian intelligence had hacked the e-mails and leaked them to Wikileaks. This statement was repeated in the Russian media outlet RT. Assange has denied any connection to or cooperation with Russia in relation to the leaks damaging to Clinton and the Democratic Party. In January 2017, Assange said that he believed the Obama administration was "trying to delegitimise the Trump administration as it goes into the White House".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange#Allegations_of_Russian_influence
Is quality of communication improving as a result of these advancements? Do we know more about the workings of government? What is all this new media doing for us? Do we uphold our own values? I think the only question we can answer is the last one.